Comments on: C++ bindings now in GNOME Documentation Library http://danielkitta.org/blog/2009/09/17/c-bindings-now-in-gnome-documentation-library/ Delusional ramblings of a narcistic individual. Wed, 09 Jun 2010 13:45:12 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: José A. http://danielkitta.org/blog/2009/09/17/c-bindings-now-in-gnome-documentation-library/comment-page-1/#comment-1179 José A. Sat, 19 Sep 2009 00:28:19 +0000 http://danielkitta.org/blog/?p=174#comment-1179 It really is excellent work. I'm just happy you took it on. :-) It really is excellent work. I’m just happy you took it on. :-)

]]> By: hron84 http://danielkitta.org/blog/2009/09/17/c-bindings-now-in-gnome-documentation-library/comment-page-1/#comment-1178 hron84 Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:41:04 +0000 http://danielkitta.org/blog/?p=174#comment-1178 Guys, Trolltech (now Nokia) produces Qt and NOT QT! The QT is Apple's QuickTime, which is not a C++ framework. Please, be careful in official documentation. Guys, Trolltech (now Nokia) produces Qt and NOT QT! The QT is Apple’s QuickTime, which is not a C++ framework. Please, be careful in official documentation.

]]> By: jonner http://danielkitta.org/blog/2009/09/17/c-bindings-now-in-gnome-documentation-library/comment-page-1/#comment-1175 jonner Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:37:08 +0000 http://danielkitta.org/blog/?p=174#comment-1175 yay. I'm very happy this finally happened. Thanks for all your hard work on it. yay. I’m very happy this finally happened. Thanks for all your hard work on it.

]]> By: Daniel Elstner http://danielkitta.org/blog/2009/09/17/c-bindings-now-in-gnome-documentation-library/comment-page-1/#comment-1174 Daniel Elstner Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:15:35 +0000 http://danielkitta.org/blog/?p=174#comment-1174 Creating a new C++ binding module has indeed been made easier, although we do not have a utility yet to generate the input files for the <code>gmmproc</code> code generator. If it is any consolation, the <a href="http://git.gnome.org/cgit/mm-common/tree/skeletonmm" rel="nofollow">skeleton source tree</a> shipped with mm-common at least provides a clean starting point for new binding modules. The appendix <a href="http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtkmm-tutorial/unstable/chapter-wrapping-c-libraries.html.en" rel="nofollow">Wrapping C Libraries with gmmproc</a> of the <a href="http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtkmm-tutorial/unstable/" rel="nofollow">Programming with gtkmm</a> guide has already been updated to document the new skeleton source tree. In the long term, the <code>gmmproc</code> part is probably best solved by rewriting <code>gmmproc</code>. Creating a new C++ binding module has indeed been made easier, although we do not have a utility yet to generate the input files for the gmmproc code generator. If it is any consolation, the skeleton source tree shipped with mm-common at least provides a clean starting point for new binding modules. The appendix Wrapping C Libraries with gmmproc of the Programming with gtkmm guide has already been updated to document the new skeleton source tree.

In the long term, the gmmproc part is probably best solved by rewriting gmmproc.

]]> By: Jesse http://danielkitta.org/blog/2009/09/17/c-bindings-now-in-gnome-documentation-library/comment-page-1/#comment-1173 Jesse Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:40:44 +0000 http://danielkitta.org/blog/?p=174#comment-1173 Great to see this being actively worked on! I was wondering though if it is now also any easier to bootstrap a binding project. If I have a gobject based library I want to bind, can I run some tool to make skeleton .hg (and others)? That would be a really nice touch! Great to see this being actively worked on! I was wondering though if it is now also any easier to bootstrap a binding project. If I have a gobject based library I want to bind, can I run some tool to make skeleton .hg (and others)? That would be a really nice touch!

]]>