<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Non-Recursive Automake Performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danielkitta.org/blog/2009/07/30/non-recursive-automake-performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danielkitta.org/blog/2009/07/30/non-recursive-automake-performance/</link>
	<description>Delusional ramblings of a narcistic individual.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 13:45:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Philip Withnall: Non-recursive automake &#124; Full-Linux.com</title>
		<link>http://danielkitta.org/blog/2009/07/30/non-recursive-automake-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-1188</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Withnall: Non-recursive automake &#124; Full-Linux.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 07:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielkitta.org/blog/?p=81#comment-1188</guid>
		<description>[...] was largely possible due to the (fairly) recent literature on the subject from Murray Cumming and Daniel Elstner, which proved rather useful; so many thanks to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was largely possible due to the (fairly) recent literature on the subject from Murray Cumming and Daniel Elstner, which proved rather useful; so many thanks to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Non-recursive automake — drboblog</title>
		<link>http://danielkitta.org/blog/2009/07/30/non-recursive-automake-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-1187</link>
		<dc:creator>Non-recursive automake — drboblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 21:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielkitta.org/blog/?p=81#comment-1187</guid>
		<description>[...] was largely possible due to the (fairly) recent literature on the subject from Murray Cumming and Daniel Elstner, which proved rather useful; so many thanks to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was largely possible due to the (fairly) recent literature on the subject from Murray Cumming and Daniel Elstner, which proved rather useful; so many thanks to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Popa Adrian Marius (mariuz) 's status on Tuesday, 13-Oct-09 11:57:49 UTC - Identi.ca</title>
		<link>http://danielkitta.org/blog/2009/07/30/non-recursive-automake-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-1184</link>
		<dc:creator>Popa Adrian Marius (mariuz) 's status on Tuesday, 13-Oct-09 11:57:49 UTC - Identi.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielkitta.org/blog/?p=81#comment-1184</guid>
		<description>[...] QotD:&quot;Happy make -j∞ !&quot; via non-recursive automake performance http://danielkitta.org/blog/2009/07/30/non-recursive-automake-performance/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] QotD:&quot;Happy make -j∞ !&quot; via non-recursive automake performance <a href="http://danielkitta.org/blog/2009/07/30/non-recursive-automake-performance/" rel="nofollow">http://danielkitta.org/blog/2009/07/30/non-recursive-automake-performance/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Elstner</title>
		<link>http://danielkitta.org/blog/2009/07/30/non-recursive-automake-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-1166</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Elstner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielkitta.org/blog/?p=81#comment-1166</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comments. Javier, your comment got caught in the spam queue -- sorry about that.

I have now added the missing numbers for running &lt;code&gt;make -j2&lt;/code&gt; a second time with nothing to be done. I did several runs with a hot cache and averaged the results. Note that &lt;code&gt;po&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;docs/user-guide&lt;/code&gt; directories are still entered recursively even with the new build setup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments. Javier, your comment got caught in the spam queue &#8212; sorry about that.</p>
<p>I have now added the missing numbers for running <code>make -j2</code> a second time with nothing to be done. I did several runs with a hot cache and averaged the results. Note that <code>po</code> and <code>docs/user-guide</code> directories are still entered recursively even with the new build setup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magnus</title>
		<link>http://danielkitta.org/blog/2009/07/30/non-recursive-automake-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-1165</link>
		<dc:creator>Magnus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 07:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielkitta.org/blog/?p=81#comment-1165</guid>
		<description>Would you mind adding timing of running make a second time, i.e. what is the time difference for finding out that nothing needs to be done?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you mind adding timing of running make a second time, i.e. what is the time difference for finding out that nothing needs to be done?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
